Benicia Herald

  • Front Page
  • News
    • Features
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Forum
  • The Arts
    • Poetry
  • About The Herald
  • May 11, 2025

Council to receive update on Benicia Marina lease

August 16, 2018 by Nick Sestanovich 1 Comment

The Benicia City Council will receive an update on the Benicia Marina and its funding history. (Photo by Nick Sestanovich)

 

For the sole business item on the Benicia City Council’s agenda, the council will receive an update on the Benicia Marina, a history of its development and a summary of the current operating agreement at the council’s Tuesday meeting.

According to a staff report by Assistant City Manager Alan Shear, the city obtained the Marina property in 1975 as part of a land swap for property in the Arsenal, including a good portion of the landward port acreage. The main purpose of the acquisition was to achieve economic development goals, Shear wrote. The original master lease stipulated that the land be used for a marina, dry boat storage and launching, boat repair, bait and tackle, restaurants, residential units and more.

To develop the marina, the city entered into a loan agreement with the California Department of Boating and Waterways in 1976. The agreement was amended four times between 1977 and 1979, which raised the amount of the loan to $5.2 million, Shear wrote.

The city entered into a 60-year lease agreement with Old Capital Marina, Ltd. in 1982, which is set to expire in 2042.

“The agreement, known as the Original Master Lease, required Old Capital to build an extensive project including a marina with wet boat berthing, dry boat storage and launching, boat repair, bait and tackle, chandlery, restaurants, residential, motel, offices, general commercial,” Shear wrote. “In reality, Old Capital acted as a pass through and immediately subleased the whole project to Southern California Savings and Loan Association (So Cal).”

In 1990, the city amended the original master lease. The amendment created four separate master leases for the project area, consisting of the Marina, 69 units for the first phase of condominiums, 116 units for the second phase of condominiums and a commercial project. Under the agreement, the city became responsible for maintaining the breakwater, including tidal gates; and allowing costs and for dredging the channel and surrounding areas. So Cal and its successors, including the Benicia Harbor Corporation, for dredging the fairways and slips as well as maintaining building improvements.

“This encompasses public facilities located in and around the marina such as the public access facilities serving the marina, including the floating dock and walkway adjacent to the existing boat launching area, the fuel tanks, the landscaping, trails, parking lots, and public restrooms,” Shear wrote. “BHC must also provide furniture and equipment to operate and maintain a small craft marina.”

In 2004, voters approved Measure C, which rezoned the commercial area to open space. Shortly after, the council adopted the Waterfront Park Initiative Measure, which effectively prevented commercial development of the area.

By the 2003-04 fiscal year, the marina’s reserve funds were depleted and the city began using General Fund transfers to cover the marina fund’s cash shortfall starting at $184,000, Shear wrote. After a 2006 settlement agreement, the Benicia Harbor Corporation became responsible for all dredging, which had previously been up to the city. The city also agreed to pay BHC a fixed fee to cover the costs of the dredging areas noted in the 1990 agreement that were considered the city’s responsibility.

According to Shear, the city’s long-term forecasts for the Marina display expenditures that continue to outpace revenues and the potential for future financial liability.

“As the loan is nearing retirement, refinancing the debt, which would extend the repayment terms by 15 – 20 years, does not seem to be a viable option at this time,” Shear wrote. “A near term future liability that has not been considered is the increased costs of disposal related to dredging. Disposal rates would substantially increase the dredging costs if the sediment needs to be moved to an area outside of the Bay. Should this occur, the City will need to provide a greater subsidy to the Marina fund, unless BHC picks up the cost.”

No action will be taken on this item.

Despite being the only business item, the consent calendar includes a lot of items up for debate. These include a resolution to reject current bids for the City Park Gazebo, voting on a Francesca Terrace Park play structure replacement and authorizing a budget increase of $60,000 to the Police Department’s Equipment Replacement Fund  to raise money for the first phase of upgrades to the women’s locker room.

The council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 21 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 250 East L St._ A closed session will precede the meeting at 6 p.m. to discuss legal matters. A live stream of the council meeting can also be found online at ci.benicia.ca.us/agendas.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponPin on Pinterest
Sharing is caring!

Filed Under: Features, Front Page, News Tagged With: Benicia, Benicia City Council, Benicia Marina

Comments

  1. Speaker to Vegetables says

    August 17, 2018 at 3:31 pm

    This situation is pretty much an encapsulation of the city’s mismanagement in general. Certainly the original design “should” have precluded the extent of dredging that must be undertaken; guess what, the designers were wrong. Costs for dredging are enormous, the plan called for “dry boat storage” but you can’t get dry boat storage since the marina operator uses most of that space for maintenance equipment (and it is a really small plot of land). Granted, it took some vision to imagine that swamp turned into a marina…and who could have foreseen the swampland sinking under the condominiums–the engineers thought it would be OK, oh yah, they were wrong too. While it probably is better to have open space where they would have put more condo’s to sink into the quagmire…the potential revenue to offset the already poor implementation of the “plan”.

    Sure, hindsight is 20-20 and of course, this problem is something that happened on “the other guys watch” BUT, is the council taking steps to limit the city’s liability for future cost increases? Doesn’t look like it t me. For example…the removal of dredging material outside the bay makes no sense. “Fill in” using the dredged material between the marina and Valero pier. Sure, permitting and EIR and other expenses will occur, but for goshsakes, be forward looking for a change instead of letting bad things just happen to us.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

Hot Off the Press

Benicia Herald Candidate Questionnaire responses

Auction of Jerrold Turner paintings to benefit Arts Benicia

Benicia City Council appoints Interim City Manager

Benicia Firefighter tests positive for COVID-19

Benicia’s Troop 7007 adds two new Eagle Scouts to its ranks

Reader Comments

  • Peggy on Bluebird of Happiness returns
  • Oliver Greenwood on Served, and serving, proudly
  • David Batchelor on Reg Page: Memories of Benicia
  • Colin larkin on Scott Swartz named new BHS varsity football head coach
  • max kirkpatrick on Fitzgerald Field is getting a makeover
  • Tracy Fetter on Fitzgerald Field makeover may be completed by end of April
  • Michael Lagrimas on Candidate Spotlight: EDB Chair Lionel Largaespada taking another shot at council seat

Popular Articles

Ace Hardware owner: We may move

Do Benicians want tar-sands oil brought here?

Dennis Lund: George Zimmerman’s ‘Oxbow Incident’

Jerome Page: It’s not inequality, it’s envy!

Science with the odor of oil

The good guys win

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in