By Isabella Zizi, Climate Campaigner, Stand.earth
From the outside looking in, the Bay Area is a bastion of progressive values and environmental stewardship, but when you look a little bit closer, the picture isn’t nearly as pretty. Right now, with support from local governments, the federal Army Corps of Engineers is pushing forward a proposal to dredge the San Francisco Bay to accommodate more oil tankers. This project is a handout from the federal government to the oil industry, at a time when our community and the world needs to push forward a clean energy transition.
A few miles north of San Francisco lies the “refinery corridor” of the East Bay. In this corridor are five different oil refineries, which for years have poisoned people who live nearby, causing respiratory illnesses, birth defects, brain damage, and cancer, all thanks to the refinery smokestacks spewing heavy pollution on a daily basis.
This is my home. My reality. I am a member of the Northern Cheyenne, Arikara and Muskogee Creek Nations and I grew up in Richmond, living two miles away from the Richmond Chevron Refinery. In August 2012, one month after my high school graduation, a massive explosion at the refinery sent 15,000 residents to the hospital. Since then, I’ve been advocating for a just transition away from these dangerous, polluting facilities to a clean energy future.
I’m telling you this so you understand where I’m coming from when I say: Donald Trump and the federal government are enacting a plan that will make our situation even worse. And not just for East Bay communities like mine that live along the refinery corridor – for everyone who calls the Bay home.
The Trump administration has commissioned the Army Corps of Engineers to dredge the San Francisco Bay, deepening a 13.2 mile stretch between Point Pinole and Martinez in order to accommodate larger oil tankers laden with heavier, more toxic crude oil known as tar sands.
If Trump is successful, there are disastrous implications, beyond increased air pollution in local communities which comes a result of the refineries processing heavier, dirtier crude oil like tar sands.
A major threat comes from the dredging process itself. Tearing up the bottom of the Bay with destructive equipment won’t just damage the fragile marine ecosystem, it will also bring toxins such as arsenic and mercury back to surface that will poison our water and land.
Then there’s the issue of the tar sands crude oil itself. While any kind of oil spill is a disaster, tar sands is especially dangerous because it doesn’t float. During a tar sands spill, the oil sinks, making it almost impossible to clean up. A tar sands spill in the Bay would remain for decades, and likely cost billions of dollars to even attempt to clean up.
And those are just the local impacts.
In Canada, my brothers and sisters from the Secwepemc, Tsleil-Waututh, and Squamish Nations, the Coldwater Indian Band, and others have been fighting for years to keep the extraction and transportation of tar sands out of their territory. Indigenous water protectors and land defenders have been at the forefront in protecting the sacred system of life since time immemorial. We cannot let them down by allowing the Bay Area to become a refining hub for tar sands.
There’s also the broader climate to consider. Tar sands is one of the dirtiest crude oils on the planet. One study projected the Bay Area’s dredging project would allow for up to an additional 7.2 million tons of CO2 to be released into the atmosphere from the additional oil brought in. That’s the equivalent of 1.4 million additional cars on the road for one year.
The world needs to start phasing out fossil fuel production – and Trump’s plan encourages just the opposite. It gifts four Bay Area oil refineries with millions in subsidies, pumps up the production of petroleum products, multiplies the risk of oil spills in local waters, threatens marine life, and increases greenhouse gas emissions and toxic pollution.
This proposal simply cannot be allowed to happen. And right now, we have a chance to stop it.
Until April 21, this dredging proposal is in a comment review period. It is up to you to send messages to the Army Corps of Engineers and your local elected officials stating your public opposition to this project. As residents of the Bay, we must stand together and act as one in opposition. The future of our home is at stake.
Isabella Zizi is a Climate Campaigner at Stand.earth, a member of Idle No More SF Bay, and signatory on the Indigenous Women of the Americas Defending Mother Earth Treaty. She is a 25-year-old lifelong resident of the East Bay and is a member of the Northern Cheyenne, Arikara and Muskogee Creek Nations. To learn more about the Bay Area dredging proposal, visit https://www.protectthebay.org/
Stan Golovich says
Some Benician’s may recall the Italian cable layer ship Giulio Verne transiting the strait back in 2010, laying a cable from Pittsburg to San Francisco. Seems to me that this cable would be an obstacle to ship channel dredging.
http://www.transbaycable.com/operations.html
Jose Gutierrez says
San Francisco is the gateway to the Bay and should be on the frontline to denying the present proposal to dredge the bay further, because the bays economy depends more on the protection of our natural resources which leads to quality of life to all who live along this peninsula, and inland areas along the corridor the present stoppage of pollution during this shelter in place should open the eyes of may to the beauty the Bay possess with less machinery polluting our environment, simply said does the benefit of private corporation outweigh the health and beauty of our bay area population.
Andres Soto says
Jose thank you for your great comments. I hope you can join those of us who are fighting against this proposal. Let me know.
Michael Zelniker says
Hello Isabella,
Thank you for writing this article. I am the Co-Chair of the Los Angeles chapter of the Climate Reality Project. Last week I had a very constructive conversation with Matt Krogh of stand.earth about how we can work together. Please feel free to reach out to me to discuss how we can assist you in your work. We have a chapter in the Bay Area. I can put you in touch with them.
I’ll also try and connect with you through Matt. Thank you again.
In solidarity,
Michael Zelniker
Andres Soto says
Thank you Isabella for this important and timely message. Unfortunately, our Congress Member Mike Thompson has been silent on this project even though we have met with him and his staff to express our concerns. Worse than that, his staff has refused to communicate despite repeated efforts to get updates from him on the progress of the project. Mr. Thompson’s opposition to this project could be a powerful component of defeating this ill-conceived example of corporate welfare and unrestricted fossil fuel industry greed. Let’s hope Thompson stands up for us. If he fails to do so, we deserve better representation than this Blue Dog.
Michael Lagrimas says
Hi Isabella, I was wondering how to input my concern about street re-pavement? I know its not about your subject matter but, I didn’t know how else to write it on the Benicia Herald as I browsed it today. It is specifically about HILLCREST AVE. IN FRONT OF THE ST. DOMINICS CEMETERY at the top of East 5th St. and Hillcrest Ave its really bad with POTHOLES. IT NEEDS REPAIR, VERY BADLY. I just need to know how to voice this in its own story on the Benicia Herald. Thank you