Benicia Herald

  • Front Page
  • News
    • Features
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Forum
  • The Arts
    • Poetry
  • About The Herald
  • June 7, 2025

Proposed downtown mixed use development to go before HPRC

February 20, 2018 by Nick Sestanovich 5 Comments

Applicants GKW Architects are proposing to turn the building at 800 First St. and its adjacent parcel into a new 2 1/2 story retail and residential development. The Historic Preservation Review Commission will provide feedback. (Photo by Nick Sestanovich)

The Historic Preservation Review Commission will hold a study session discussion on a proposal to redesign a building at the corner of First and East H streets as a 2 ½ story mixed-use building at its Thursday meeting.

Campbell-based firm GKW Architects is proposing to redevelop the building at 800 First St. with a new multi-use development consisting of 2,924 square feet of retail on the ground floor and nine residential units on the above floor, according to a staff report by Principal Planner Suzanne Thorsen. The property in question includes 800 First St. and the adjoining vacant parcel at East H Street. The current one-story building is identified as a contributing structure in Benicia’s Downtown Historic District, having been constructed in either the 1920s or early ‘30s as a gas station, according to a 2004 historic survey. It currently houses a variety of tenants, including Spotless Carpet Cleaning, Anh’s Salon and Bayside Vintage Living & Design. However, according to the staff report, the building would have to be demolished and the two existing parcels merged into one as part of development of the site.

The building would keep the original facade elements and parapet walls, maintain the building facade along property lines to define the street, and add balconies to match the existing building across the street, recessed entries, vertical framing elements between storefront glazing, smaller vertical windows at the upper floor, screened parking facilities, outdoor dining spaces and window planter boxes.

The city conducted a pre-application meeting on Jan. 9 with GKW Architects and the property owners regarding potential development in the area. The applicant received information on required procedures, submittal fees and regulatory compliance, Thorsen wrote. As a result, GKW Architects was advised to seek consultation with the HPRC prior to submitting a development application for the site.

Thorsen wrote that the building has evidently been altered since the 2004 survey, since the Mission tile trim on the roofline in the accompanying photograph has been removed. This alteration does not have a design review record.

“Because demolition would result in a substantial adverse change to the historic resource that typically cannot be mitigated, the applicant has been advised that an EIR (Environmental Impact Report) will be necessary for review of the application under the California Environmental Quality Act,” Thorsen wrote.

Staff recommends the HPRC review the conceptual development information and provide feedback to the architect.

In other matters, the HPRC will hear further updates to the Downtown Historic District guidelines.

The HPRC will meet at 6:30 p.m., Thursday, Feb. 22 in City Hall’s Commission Room, located at 250 East L St.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponPin on Pinterest
Sharing is caring!

Filed Under: Features, Front Page, News Tagged With: Benicia, downtown historic district, GKW Architects, Historic Preservation Review Commission

Comments

  1. Greg Gartrell says

    February 20, 2018 at 4:04 pm

    A good example of when exceptions to good rules should be allowed: just because a building is in the Historic District that is remarkable only for its out of character ugliness is no reason to hinder changing it to something more pleasing that will enhance downtown. An EIR?? Really?? because the impact of changing its ugliness cannot be mitigated?

    Reply
    • Bob "The Owl" Livesay says

      February 21, 2018 at 7:08 am

      The EIR may be for the underground gas tanks that have not been removed. I do not know that. Easy to find out.

      Reply
      • Thomas Petersen says

        February 21, 2018 at 10:35 am

        USTs are not addressed in EIRs, rather in ESAs as part of due diligence assessments.

        Reply
        • Thomas Petersen says

          February 21, 2018 at 11:39 am

          Additionally, the UST issue for this property was closed-out in 1996 in accordance with local regulatory requirements at the time.

          Reply
  2. alves d says

    February 21, 2018 at 10:38 am

    Will 814 first st be affected ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

Hot Off the Press

Benicia Herald Candidate Questionnaire responses

Auction of Jerrold Turner paintings to benefit Arts Benicia

Benicia City Council appoints Interim City Manager

Benicia Firefighter tests positive for COVID-19

Benicia’s Troop 7007 adds two new Eagle Scouts to its ranks

Reader Comments

  • Peggy on Bluebird of Happiness returns
  • Oliver Greenwood on Served, and serving, proudly
  • David Batchelor on Reg Page: Memories of Benicia
  • Colin larkin on Scott Swartz named new BHS varsity football head coach
  • max kirkpatrick on Fitzgerald Field is getting a makeover
  • Tracy Fetter on Fitzgerald Field makeover may be completed by end of April
  • Michael Lagrimas on Candidate Spotlight: EDB Chair Lionel Largaespada taking another shot at council seat

Popular Articles

Ace Hardware owner: We may move

Do Benicians want tar-sands oil brought here?

Dennis Lund: George Zimmerman’s ‘Oxbow Incident’

Jerome Page: It’s not inequality, it’s envy!

Science with the odor of oil

The good guys win

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in