Benicia Herald

  • Front Page
  • News
    • Features
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Forum
  • The Arts
    • Poetry
  • About The Herald
  • May 30, 2025

Letters: Fee hikes and emission caps

June 20, 2017 by Editor 2 Comments

Benicia fee hikes

The Benicia mayor and City Council are preparing to vote on fee increases and new permits that are estimated to raise $1.5 million as our elected officials attempt to balance the city budget. This increase would be in addition to the water and sewer rate increases passed by the city council last November (with additional hikes taking place every July 1 through 2020-2021). It’s all part of the plan to lift Benicia out of an anticipated budget shortfall.
This means Benicians and its businesses will be paying more for things like applications, inspections, licenses, permits, appeals, and reviews.
There is no denying the city of Benicia is desperately in need of revenue-generating measures, but the decision to raise fees must be made very carefully, and not with the idea that this burden will only affect big-time developers and corporate-backed franchises.
Are you remodeling a bathroom, putting in a retaining wall or making space to seat more customers? The fee increases will affect a range of us. Here’s a look at some of the hikes:
• In the Planning Division, fees will increase an average of 249 percent
•In the Public Works Division, fees will increase of 358 percent
• In the Building Division, fees will increase an average of 358 percent

The rationale for having user fees is the “benefits” principle. This is the idea that he or she who benefits should pay. At a glance, the premise appears valid. However, home improvements improve curb appeal and re-investing in a business attracts more customers which respectively boost home sale prices and property taxes and increases revenue derived from more sales. These are benefits to the city of Benicia.
If the proposed fee increases pass, it could discourage the alterations, additions and repairs to homes and local businesses that help to produce jobs and economic development in Benicia. It could inhibit economic growth, and we should all be concerned about that.
In Benicia, we need an environment that promotes stronger investments via lower burdens and burdens that are competitive from a county standpoint. We want to promote spending. We want to encourage home and business improvements and economic development by lowering the hurdles and barriers that stifle growth. Let’s continue to promote a balance between revenue generation and the cost of improving our homes and retaining and expanding our businesses.

Lionel Largaespada,
Benicia

Important meeting on emission caps

On June 21 at 9:45 a.m., the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors is set to make a historic vote and limit greenhouse gas emissions– and thereby other pollutants that go with them– of refineries. Refineries are the biggest stationary source of air pollution in the Bay Area, and they are set to start bringing in dirtier crude oil, especially tar sands from Canada, which will increase air pollution that could lead to the premature deaths of up to 3,000 people in the Bay Area.
Rule 12-16 puts a cap on this extra pollution, and the board seems about to adopt it. But wait – at the last minute the staff is proposing that they can issue exemptions from the cap. This would gut the rule and open the door to greater air pollution and refining of dirtier crude. Tar sands from Canada cannot be cleaned up if it spills, use more energy to mine and refine, and emit much more dangerous air pollution. Its high sulfur content also corrodes equipment and lead to the Chevron accident a few years back that sent thousands to seek medical care.
Please let your Solano county board members (Supervisor Jim Spering, jimzspering@sbcglobal.net, and Suisun Mayor Pete Sanchez, psanchez@suisun.com) to support the caps, but oppose the exemption. Come show your support at the meeting, which will be held on the first floor of the Board Hearing Room on 375 Beale St. in San Francisco. Our health depends on it.

Kathy Kerridge,
Benicia

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponPin on Pinterest
Sharing is caring!

Filed Under: Features, Letters, Opinion Tagged With: Benicia, fee increases, letters, opinion, refinery

Comments

  1. Bob "The Owl" Livesay says

    June 20, 2017 at 7:11 am

    I would ask Kathy Kerridge where she got the 3,000 number. That may be true but the info is very important to verify that number. If no very strong data then it is pure scare tactics. Also how much of the oil coming to the five refineries is Canada Tar Sands crude. What percentage is it of all crude used to refine. Also how much was coming in in the last five years. A graph would help. Both of those statements must be verified.

    Reply
  2. Bob "The Owl" Livesay says

    June 22, 2017 at 10:12 am

    Kathy you cleverly use the word “stationary”. But in reality it is the motor vehicle at 41% that is the big polluter. Are you now going to go after the drivers of these cars and put restrictions on them. You cannot legislate personal behavior.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

Hot Off the Press

Benicia Herald Candidate Questionnaire responses

Auction of Jerrold Turner paintings to benefit Arts Benicia

Benicia City Council appoints Interim City Manager

Benicia Firefighter tests positive for COVID-19

Benicia’s Troop 7007 adds two new Eagle Scouts to its ranks

Reader Comments

  • Peggy on Bluebird of Happiness returns
  • Oliver Greenwood on Served, and serving, proudly
  • David Batchelor on Reg Page: Memories of Benicia
  • Colin larkin on Scott Swartz named new BHS varsity football head coach
  • max kirkpatrick on Fitzgerald Field is getting a makeover
  • Tracy Fetter on Fitzgerald Field makeover may be completed by end of April
  • Michael Lagrimas on Candidate Spotlight: EDB Chair Lionel Largaespada taking another shot at council seat

Popular Articles

Ace Hardware owner: We may move

Do Benicians want tar-sands oil brought here?

Dennis Lund: George Zimmerman’s ‘Oxbow Incident’

Jerome Page: It’s not inequality, it’s envy!

Science with the odor of oil

The good guys win

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in