By Larry Fullington
Special to the Herald
I want to tell you a story.
Recently, Kate and I were waiting for the BART train to take us to San Francisco. While waiting, a young woman joined us on the platform. As we talked, she told us she was an American Indian from Arizona. She had been sent here by her tribe to attend a drug rehabilitation center. She was a recovering heroin addict and had just “graduated” from the center. She was going home to Arizona to restart her life. Her child had been taken from her because of her addiction, and the court had now agreed to return the youngster to her. Also, her mother had kicked her out because she was caught stealing money from her to feed her habit. She still needed to work on reconciling with her mother.
I asked her how it all started. She was very frank. She started with marijuana until she needed a stronger high. She then moved on to cocaine until she needed a stronger high. This followed with a progression to meth, then finally to heroin when everything fell apart. This was when she lost custody of her child and suffered her estrangement from her mother. She now has high hopes of starting again with a clean life and caring for her child and family.
We don’t know how she is doing now. We do know it is going to be very difficult for her, including the possibility of the child being a crack baby.
Recently, I read a report of studies done by the major universities of Duke, Harvard and Northwestern concerning marijuana. In every case, they found that with regular use of marijuana in young, developing brains, there was a permanent reduction in IQ. This is not just scary, it is tragic on the possible loss of some potential for our youth. If anyone thinks grass is not an entry level product to more dangerous drugs, they are simply choosing to ignore the obvious. I am sure this information must weigh heavily on the City Councilmembers and their decisions on whether to allow a marijuana processing plant and retail outlet in our town.
Councilmember Mark Hughes said something quite interesting at a recent Council meeting. He said if we allow marijuana to be processed and sold openly in our town, it could change the image of our city forever. I think he could be right. My personal view is that just because marijuana is legal in our state, it does not mean we have to encourage or endorse it. To help balance the budget, I would rather see us give up some of our amenities rather than welcome in this dangerous product. (By the way, marijuana as it is processed today is far stronger than it was some years ago). It seems to me continuing, extensive education for our youth and their families is the best solution to the drug problem and potential problems.
The City Council welcomes your comments, and if not already done, they need to hear your feelings about this matter. Do you care enough to be willing to get involved? Are you willing to call or write to your councilmembers or speak at Council meetings? If not, we stand to reap the consequences, and I fear those consequences could be very sad.
Larry Fullington is a Benicia resident.
Stan Golovich says
The DEA earlier this year was forced to remove cannabis “gateway” baloney from its web page.
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/iqa_victory
Nobody that consumes cannabis medicinally or recreationally “needs” a stronger response. In my youth/young adult stages, I smoked more cannabis than anyone in Benicia today, but never graduated to harder drugs. Cannabis is more often an end point, and and now data from around the nation is indicating it to be a pathway OUT of opioid addiction in states where it is regulated. Social conditions, such as living on a reservation or in an economically depressed neighborhood, are more often at the root of a person’s desire to experiment with more powerful drugs. By the way, the DEA says cocaine, morphine, opium, and methamphetamine (Schedule 2/2N narcotics and stimulants) have medicinal value. ATAB.
I agree that continuing youth education about chronic consumption while their brains are still forming is an essential component of regulated cannabis, and they are listening. Federal survey data indicates youth interest in cannabis to be at a 20 year low, and states where it is regulated are indicating youth interest to be unchanged or declining.
https://tinyurl.com/ydb9wsnr
The feelings of Benicia residents on cannabis were expressed in last year’s Prop. 64 vote. Tip o’ the hat to Scott Strawbridge for publicly sharing he voted for Prop. 64, responsible adult consumption. It’s as simple as that.
Bob "The Owl" Livesay says
The big issue Stan is not in my backyard. They may hyave3 voted yes but with restrictions. You can get all the cannabis you want from out of town. After Jan 1 you can get all you want of the Recreational Cannabis. Which is it you Stan, want medical or recreational? Quit trying to sell the residents on all the glamour of Cannabis..
Bob "The Owl" Livesay says
Excellent letter Larry. Right on. Thank you.
Thomas Petersen says
Larry, Stan is correct. The “gateway” theory is bogus. The “gateway” exists in one place, and one place only, and that is within the individual choosing to use ever more stronger drugs. If a person has the proclivity to use drugs at all, there is nothing that will stop that. The person you described moved on to cocaine and heroin, regardless of the fact that those are completely illegal, yet still available at the drop of a hat. The war on drugs should be declared a wash.
Oilcan says
Great pro gun comment. People kill people… not guns.
Thomas Petersen says
IDK if my comment is pro-gun, specifically. However, your point seems valid.